24 Jun
2014
24 Jun
'14
6:25 a.m.
On 24/06/2014 18:21, Adam Romanek wrote:
Just out of curiosity - why haven't you chosen the std::reverse_iterator -based approach described in the old thread?
"It should also work with integers now, as was originally intended by David Abrahams" + BOOST_REQUIRE(boost::next(5) == 6); + BOOST_REQUIRE(boost::next(5, 7) == 12);