Re: [boost] [ptr_container] Failures for ptr_set and ptr_unordered_set on Intel, Acc, and Cxx

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

I've removed the two other functions, because the one with two template arguments is more general. It's committed to trunk, so let's see how it goes.

With your last commit, the tests ptr_set and ptr_unordered_set now pass for me on Cxx without any warnings or errors. Most likely Intel and Acc are now happy, too. Thank you, Markus