Rene Rivera wrote:
Ping? Anyone?
I guess no one maintains Boost.Graph, how sad :-( Anyway this change makes graph and python pass all tests with MinGW+STLport5: Index: adjacency_list.hpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/graph/detail/adjacency_list.hpp,v retrieving revision 1.136 diff -u -r1.136 adjacency_list.hpp --- adjacency_list.hpp 12 Jul 2005 03:10:28 -0000 1.136 +++ adjacency_list.hpp 13 Oct 2005 05:53:55 -0000 @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include <map> // for vertex_map in copy_impl #include <boost/config.hpp> +#include <boost/detail/workaround.hpp> #include <boost/operators.hpp> #include <boost/property_map.hpp> #include <boost/pending/integer_range.hpp> @@ -2669,12 +2670,16 @@ #if !defined(BOOST_NO_HASH) && !defined(BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION) namespace BOOST_STD_EXTENSION_NAMESPACE { + #if BOOST_WORKAROUND( _STLPORT_VERSION, >= 0x500 ) + // STLport 5 already defines a hash<void*> specialization. + #else template <> struct hash< void* > // Need this when vertex_descriptor=void* { std::size_t operator()(void* v) const { return (std::size_t)v; } }; + #endif template <typename V> struct hash< boost::detail::stored_edge<V> > =================================================================== Doug, OK to commit?
Rene Rivera wrote:
There seems to be a conflict between the Graph library and the new STLport... http://tinyurl.com/dk2fc [1]
[1] http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_33_0/developer/ou...
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org