19 Feb
2004
19 Feb
'04
8:20 p.m.
At 06:32 PM 2/18/2004, Darren Cook wrote:
Also it seems the more libraries in boost the longer it takes to get a regression-passing release out,
That, together with the download size, are issues Boost will have to solve in order to grow. And we will solve those issues. We shouldn't start rejecting otherwise useful libraries because of them.
so adding it just because it is clever and well-written is not a good enough reason in my opinion.
Agreed, but if "useful" is added, and of course the other Boost qualifications are met, then "clever and well-written" look pretty good. (That's a general comment - I haven't looked at FC++ so have no opinion as to its usefulness.) --Beman