Re: [boost] Interest in a small Enum IO utility?

Marcus Lindblom wrote:

Jeff Garland wrote:

...

I think there'd be some interest. Basically enums without a string mapping aren't much use -- and there was interest in boost_enum and other enum related helpers.

I didn't know about the previous Boost.Enum proposal. It seems to be abandoned. I'll have to dig through the archives to see what happened with it.

Seems likely at this point.

However, my "lib" is much smaller in scope, intentionally.

Yep -- that's likely a good thing. Anyway, I'd be interested in seeing a full proposal. Jeff