28 Jul
2011
28 Jul
'11
9:24 a.m.
On 26.07.2011 19:23, Tim Blechmann wrote:
i would hope that it is to late for a boost.atomic, but at the moment it doesn't seem to be obsolete:
* the c++0x support of clang++ is rather limited. they basically ask you to install a patched version of libstdc++. The patch is just to work around GCC 4.4's broken libstdc++ (it was written to a draft version of rvalue references). and libc++ is listing<atomic> as the final remaining piece for quite some time :/
i cannot comment on the micro$oft side, but i regularly see workarounds for missing c99 features ...
VS2010 doesn't have any support for <atomic>, but unlike C99, they actually plan to support C++0x. Sebastian