Jody Hagins wrote:
Of course an alternative would be for <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp> to include .../shared_ptr_132.hpp but I thought people without old archives would object to that - as I would personally.
Sounds like a preprocessor definition should be used instead, and then serialization/shared_ptr.hpp can optionally include the 132 header file, if the apprpriate definition for use-132-shared-ptr exists...
This effectively hides it from everyone, and only those who need it would make the appropriate definition...
Definitely a step in the right direction, but it does not remove the need for shared_ptr_132.hpp to check for the header-guard of serialization/shared_ptr.hpp and flag errors on mis-use. Belt AND braces if you please <g> -- AlisdairM