Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
niedz., 15 wrz 2024 o 21:43 Joaquín M López Muñoz via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> napisał(a):
It would if field experience weighed more in WG21’s acceptance criteria.
But because it often doesn't, the Beman Project does indeed fulfil an important role. If nothing else (and there is likely more, that I fail to appreciate), it allows one to prove that what is proposed is actually implementable.
The Beman Project can be (and will be) tailored to the needs of LEWG. LEWG doesn't need a second opinion on the library design or utility; what they need is a place that would hold the reference implementations and their test suites and that would ensure that these meet some minimum (objective) quality standards (e.g. the test suite has sufficient coverage and compiles and passes.)