Paul A Bristow <pbristow <at> hetp.u-net.com> writes:
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces <at> lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces <at> lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental Sent: 23 July 2008 18:38 To: boost <at> lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [test] documentatation on patmedia.net disappeared,not up to date on boost.org
Could you at least check in html documentation only, without
Ilya Sokolov <fal_delivery <at> mail.ru> writes: sources?
I think I'll do just this.
OK - this is a great help - but long-term can we find someone who is willing
to rewrite the whole document in
Quickbook?
1. I don't think it's possible. Even BoostBook is not able to handle what I need. I've got bunch of xsl scripts built on top and I had to make core changes in BoostBook itself (not very big, but significant). 2. We've been through this discussion before. I need to be able to support the documentation. And I am not looking forward learning yet another documentation format or yet another tool that produces my format. All in all I do not see advantages in using quickbook.
The docs can then link directly to the examples, and perhaps include new examples.
Examples support in Boost.Test docs is much more sophisticated. Resulting html includes code, output, source and annotation (not yet fully functional) Gennadiy