On 10/5/2015 7:16 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 28/09/15 16:45, paul Fultz a écrit :
Hi All,
Boost.Fit is a header-only function utility library for C++11. It supports both gcc, clang and visual studio. More info can be found here:
I have two questions to this list as review manager of this library:
In his current state the library is in namespace fit the files are under directory fit and the macros are prefixed by FIT_. Do we need that Paul moves to the namespace boost::fit, directory boost/fit and prefix by BOOST_FIT_ the macros before the review?
It would be easier testing the library if the directory structure matched that of Boost source. I don't think the two other things are required for the review.
The documentation doesn't contain hypertext helping to navigate from the usage of a function to its reference documentation. This make more difficult the review even if there is a explorer for the table of contents. Do we need hypertext links before the review?
It would be nice but it shouldn't hold up a review.