Andrey Melnikov <melnikov@simplexsoft.com> writes:
Rene Rivera wrote:
This "flicker" is only a problem on IE. There's only so much time I will spend on working around bugs on IE. Just like we don't spend much time in supporting old C++ compilers.
I'd suggest just not to use these >> at all
The ">>" if kept, should probably be replaced by the graphic element from the Boost logo.
and use 2 stylesheets on the page so if user has a browser capable to select stylesheets she will be happy.
What would the stylesheets have to do with the flickering problem? <facetious>Why should we stop at two stylesheets?</facetious> What's the point?
I'm against JS, page beauty
Any enemy of beauty is an enemy of mine ;-)
and fixing IE bugs. I'm for standard compliant XHTML/CSS, and for page usability.
Usability and beauty often are interdependent.
Boost doesn't e
I don't "e" either ;-)
I dislike old minimalistic design of the homepage because it reminds me days of IE3/NN4. But I'd prefer more visible links. Body readability doesn't matter at all for me. I vote for something like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Jutland (as an alternate stylesheet).
I've always liked Wikipedia. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com