Doug Gregor wrote:
On Mar 19, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
For a full list of 1.35.0 test regressions, see http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/summary.html
Or, better yet:
http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/issues.html
There are a few 1.35.0 regressions I'm not particularly concerned about; VC++ 7.1 is now old news, and no one seems to care much about the Intel/Windows compiler.
Given that VC++ 9.0 has been out for awhile now, it would be nice to kill off a few more of those regressions before 1.35.0 ships:
* Graph
As Richard Webb noted, it fails for the same reason as VC++ 8.0 fails, so we should just mark this as "expected" as well. Okay for me to go ahead and do that on the trunk and release branch?
Yes, please!
Red regressions I'm concerned about are:
* Numeric/interval on Darwin. * Serialization on Darwin.
This is the trivial patch to fix the Serialization failures on Darwin:
Index: libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp =================================================================== --- libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp (revision 43724) +++ libs/serialization/example/portable_binary_oarchive.hpp (working copy) @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ public: friend class boost::archive::basic_binary_oarchive<portable_binary_oarchive>; friend class boost::archive::save_access; #endif - void save_impl(const long l){ + void save_impl(long l){ long ll = l; char size = 0; if(l < 0){
Tested on Darwin (both PowerPC and Intel); shall I commit to the trunk and the release branch?
Yes, thanks! --Beman