26 Jun
2011
26 Jun
'11
9:57 a.m.
Hi, On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 22:18, Lars Viklund <zao@acc.umu.se> wrote:
If I saw a bump of Boost to 2.x.0, I would expect that something massive and somewhat breaking has occurred, along the lines of:
* complete build system revamp, with different build methods and library naming convention;
* modularisation of boost libraries into largely standalone components, with some infrastructure to roll monolithic and custom releases;
* in essence - Ryppl and the Boost.CMake effort.
I always thought that update of all or most of libraries to take account of some important C++0x features (like adding move semantics where apropriate) would have it's part in bumping boost to 2.x . Or something related to C++0x. Joël Lamotte