----- Original Message ----- From: "Frédéric Bron" <frederic.bron@m4x.org> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:23 PM Subject: Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits libraryofhas_operator_xxx
I would expect all the C++ operators to be covered as ConceptTraits/OperatorTrats did. Next follows an extract from the documentation of this library for the missing operators. ::boost::has_address_of_op<T>::value ::boost::has_dereference_op<T>::value ::boost::has_member_access_op<T>::value ::boost::has_subscript_op<T1 [,T2]>::value ::boost::has_pointer_to_member_op<T1 [,T2]>::value ::boost::has_comma_op<T1 [,T2]>::value ::boost::has_function_call_op<T,R [,P1, ...]>::value
Not sure I am able to add all of them. &, * look rather similar to unary operator I added.
BTW, where are the new extensions documented, could you give a link?
Documentation is accessible at libs/type_traits/doc/html/index.html in the archive or in the sandbox. Frédéric _______________________________________________ It will be a shame if some operators, for which the trait can be defined, dont have it. Have you take a look to ConceptTraits? Maybe you can adapt the implementation? Oh I see them now on the reference documentation. I was looking for a section that explains the motivation and the list of new traits that need to be reveiwed. Vicente