
Le 20/10/12 05:03, Gennadiy Rozenal a écrit :
Hi,
It's been a long while since I merged any changes into boost release and by now there are whole bunch of new features there. Some are small, but some others are big ones such that they can change the way people use the library. I'd like to list them here (excluding bug fixes and removal of deprecated interfaces) and ask what should we do with these. Specifically let me know if you think these require some kind of (mini) review from community, but any other comments are welcome as well.
Hi, I'm trying to build the documentation in trunk and I'm getting bjam /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/util/path.jam:516: in make-UNIX from module path error: Empty path passed to 'make-UNIX' /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/util/path.jam:41: in path.make from module path /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/libs/test/doc/utf-boostbook.jam:20: in load from module utf-boostbook /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/kernel/modules.jam:289: in import from module modules /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/build/toolset.jam:39: in toolset.using from module toolset /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/build/project.jam:995: in using from module project-rules Jamfile.v2:12: in modules.load from module Jamfile</Users/viboes/boost/trunk/libs/test/doc> /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/build/project.jam:311: in load-jamfile from module project /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/build/project.jam:64: in load from module project /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/build/project.jam:145: in project.find from module project /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/build-system.jam:552: in load from module build-system /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/kernel/modules.jam:289: in import from module modules /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/tools/build/v2/kernel/bootstrap.jam:139: in boost-build from module /Users/viboes/boost/trunk/boost-build.jam:17: in module scope from module What could be wrong on my environment? BTW, could you tell us which features are exclusive of a c++11 compliant compiler? Best, Vicente