Re: [boost] [Signals] Re: [Report] 79 regressions on RC_1_34_0 (2007-03-22)

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 17:02 -0500, Zach Laine wrote:

Good point. I tried to modify the test so that it throws in short_lived_2::f() instead, but that seems to work fine. I tried a standalone test program with 1.33.1, HEAD, and RC_1_34_0_freeze, and only 1.33.1 seems to show the problem I was trying to demonstrate.

That's a *big* relief. Cheers, Doug