Hello, I've been lurking about and following the logging discussions off and on. I'm saddened to see it hasn't made it into 1.47 which means I must get a compatible patch from svn and compile it into my packages (on opensuse build service) and cannot rely on distro maintainers boost packages. Andrey, if you're reading this, consider getting it in if only to end the limbo of logging in the cross-platform c++ environment and improving things from there. Boost.Log is plenty fast (at least for my work which is composed of threads and soft-RT stuff for which async logging helps with latencies) and I trust it more than other libraries. From the examples I was also able to make it pretty easy to use in my code environment. As a user I'd say it's ready to use and it would be hard to find a better library. Best, Jason On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Ronald Garcia <rxg@cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
On Jul 13, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Jeff Graham wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know when we can expect a blessed logging facility to make it into an official release of boost?
There seem to be 2 logging candidates: 1) one by Andrey Semashev (provisionally accepted 16 months ago in March 2010).
2)one by John Torjo that seems to have finished development 3 years ago at version 0.22.7 in Feb 2008. On John's blog it says it was up for review then. Then a post in May 2008 at http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/what-s-up-with-the-logging-libraries- td2579613.html seems to indicate there will be another version with "quite a rewrite" and implying that may be the version to be reviewed.
Following the provisional acceptance of Andrey's library, John ceased development of his proposed library.
Ron
Can someone give any update on either logger, and if there is any plan for getting them into boost?
Thanks _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost