14 Oct
2008
14 Oct
'08
6:35 p.m.
on Tue Oct 14 2008, "John Maddock" <john-AT-johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote:
Steven Watanabe wrote:
Heh, I forgot about that one. Suppose we just
#define check BOOST_PREVENT_MACRO_SUBSTITUION check
? ;-)
Won't that cause macro redefinition errors? Also, how is it different from
#define check check
In fact it's not really any different from:
#undef check
is it?
Programmers are such literalists. I assumed you would not take that suggestion seriously, given the winky. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com