12 Jul
2006
12 Jul
'06
4:10 p.m.
I think here you may need to revert back to using those "cryptic" | suffixes. Since the possibilities are pretty limited, they won't be | quite so cryptic anymore. So maybe something like | "probability_c" for complementary cdf? I've just lost some hair discovering a down-side of the neat _c - it is easy to forget/not notice it. Doh! So there is some benefit in a longer name. Paul --- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS pbristow@hetp.u-net.com