8 Feb
2009
8 Feb
'09
6:10 p.m.
on Sun Feb 01 2009, "Max" <loadcom-AT-sina.com> wrote:
Totally agree. An uniformed standard on coding, performance, compatibility and doc is important.
I think Robert and Max may be right. Boost's reputation has spread quite a bit in recent years, and many more people are using it, and living up to that reputation is a much more serious business than it used to be. Even if Boost wants to remain "somewhat experimental," it could be very bad for our users (and, consequently, for us) if our official releases don't reflect tighter standards. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com