2 Feb
2004
2 Feb
'04
4:48 p.m.
At 11:09 AM 2/2/2004, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
Perhaps the function could return optional<bool> or something similar.
Give the stated aim of the library to be useful for simple, script-like programs, that seems a bit like overkill. Also, I'm grooming this library for submission to the Standards committee. The less dependencies on components not in the standard, the better. Of course, boost::optional may get submitted someday too... --Beman