On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 05:13:49PM +0000, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
a few remarks:
Example 32 (http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/utf/testing-tools/custom-
Jens Seidel <jensseidel <at> users.sf.net> writes: predicate.html)
does not include boost/test/auto_unit_test.hpp which is required for BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE.
No it's not. In fact above header is depricated.
Right, I used older headers. Sorry.
You should also fix the typo comparizon (use s instead of z).
Some people prefer comparizon. It sounds more cool ;) But I'll fix it.
I know that there are some differences between British and American English related to s/z. But I still doubt that comparizon is valid. http://dict.leo.org/ende?lp=ende&p=eL4jU.&search=comparison mentions comparison is valid for British and American (see "color comparison" entry)!
Your example output doesn't display the full message but truncates it.
What do you mean?
Your help page custom-predicate.html contains a link "Show output". Clicking it I see a window with black background containing the text: <quote> Running 1 test case... test.cpp(28): error in "test_list_comparizon": check compare_list *** 1 failure detected in test suite "example" </quote> It seems that the text is too wide for the default font. In Iceweasel I see <quote> Running 1 test case... test.cpp(28): error in "test_list_comparizon": check compare_lists( l1, l2 ) failed. Diffe *** 1 failure detected in test suite "example" </quote> Do you see the difference?
Adapting your example using templates I get the following error (g++ 4.1, 4.2, ...):
What did you do?
I attached a sample program in my last mail. But the problem was indeed on my side: I tried to compile BOOST_CHECK( compare_lists<1,2>( l1, l2 ) ) but because of the comma I need to use an additional pair of commas.
example31.cpp:25:47: error: macro "BOOST_CHECK" passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1 example31.cpp: In function ‘void test_list_comparizon()’: example31.cpp:25: error: ‘BOOST_CHECK’ was not declared in this scope
This is easily fixed:
BOOST_CHECK(( compare_lists( l1, l2 ) ));
Right :-) Jens