Michael Glassford wrote:
I believe CW9.3 should be marked as well. It's actually passing for some reason, but I don't understand how it could; Stefan Slapeta is looking into it. I think it would be best to mark it as an expected failure so that the results show that its passing the tests is unexpected, at least until we figure out that why.
Bad news: also the results for Intel are incorrect, the static cleanup doesn't work for Intel Compiler, either: Running 1 test case... tss_instances = 0; tss_total = 5 tss_instances = 5; tss_total = 5 ../libs/thread/test/test_tss.cpp(152): error in "test_tss": test tss_instances == 0 failed [5 != 0] *** 1 failure detected in test suite "Boost.Threads: tss test suite" EXIT STATUS: 0 I'll markup this as expected failure and submit a feature request for the Intel Compiler. Stefan