3 May
2005
3 May
'05
9:49 a.m.
In-Reply-To: <d4j89a$cd7$1@sea.gmane.org> gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com (Gennadiy Rozental) wrote (abridged):
BOOST_FOREACH
By the way, is there a rationale for the name? I'd have expected BOOST_FOR_EACH, with a word separator between FOR and EACH because, well they are separate words. This also matches the precedent of std::for_each. Word separators are especially important for names that are all in capitals. Is there a compelling reason to omit the second underline? -- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK.