[boost] Re: boost v 1.33 ?

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

Robert Ramey writes: [...]

The above assumes that *the main trunk* is in the good state, and it's not --

actually it assumes this the main trunk can be brought to a good state in a relatively short time like 10 days. I don't believe the number of red squares is an accurate reflection of the state and how much work there is to do. Many of these problems have a common cause. In at least one case, there's a new compiler which wasn't tested at 1.32 at all. I believe that a new release have improvements over the current one and have no regressions. Robert Ramey

(red shows regressions against 1.32.0).