13 May
2006
13 May
'06
5:33 p.m.
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
Also note that the user doesn't have to "find" the type in the message -- it's right there, saying something like TypeNotRegistered=blah<...; and it's always about user's own type if lambda types are indeed registered (if we are talking about lambda). And it seems to me that it's much easier to register lambda types than implement what you propose.
Maybe so. I'm beginning to think that I may have overestimated the amount of registration that would be required here.
So, do we *have* typeof registrations for the lambda and bind libraries? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com