10 Jun
2005
10 Jun
'05
7:37 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
vc6/7 have a similar problem. The vc6 workaround ought to work for that particular issue.
I had planned to take a look at these this weekend.
That sounds better than my solution <g> Especially as this library may become a popular implementation detail in other libraries. Could you describe the VC workaround if you get some free time? [I'd put priority on applying the patch over explaining it though ;?)] -- AlisdairM