12 Oct
2006
12 Oct
'06
9:09 p.m.
On 10/12/06, Arkadiy Vertleyb <vertleyb@hotmail.com> wrote:
More importantly, according to the standard, the basic_string class destructor is not virtual, and so basic_string is not intended for derivation.
Wouldn't this only matter if super_string added data members (it doesn't AFAICT) and was being deleted via pointers to std::basic_string? -- Caleb Epstein