30 Apr
2014
30 Apr
'14
10:52 a.m.
On 29 Apr 2014 at 21:40, Louis Dionne wrote:
I have a question: the proposal and library are called MPL11.
That is true, but I'm starting to realize that it's a very bad name. The project started about two years ago, when C++14 was still out of my sight. Be reassured that I always consider the latest version of the language, not only C++11.
What's wrong with MPL v2.0? Niall -- Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/