13 Oct
2005
13 Oct
'05
4:58 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Wow, that's a little scary. Was that someone who's generally on the ball, or one of those very few who sometimes vociferously object to what's being proposed on the grounds that it doesn't do the very thing it actually does?
I don't like the direction this is going in. Let's just say that my presentation of optional was not detailed enough for people not familiar with the concept. Mea culpa. Thomas -- Thomas Witt witt@acm.org