k-oli@gmx.de writes:
Am Freitag, 12. September 2008 13:24:14 schrieb joaquin@tid.es:
It'd be an odd thing if we had a TR2 threadpool lib and a different lib in Boost (assuming both proposals are succesful). Shoudln't there be some some syncing between the respective authors?
What about the future libs (see review schedule)? Anthonys proposal in TR2 and BRaddocks implementation are also not in sync?!
That's true. My futures implementation is up for review alongside Braddock's. Incidentally, the C++ comittee voted futures into C++0x last week. The proposals that got voted in are: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2671.html http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2709.html Anthony -- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL