1 Feb
2015
1 Feb
'15
4:48 p.m.
Peter Dimov wrote:
The reason Stephen talks about splitting serialization is that adding serialization support needs only a few includes, independent of the rest of the library.
And in fact if you look through
http://www.pdimov.com/tmp/report-develop-c3bb6eb/serialization.html#reverse-...
you'll see that many, if not most, of the serialization dependencies are like that.
Yes, but Robert will not discuss splitting it. There's no point even trying to come up with a solution until that changes, but it can be pointed to as a problem for anyone willing to listen :). That's what I've been trying to point out for months. Thanks, Steve.