On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 07:52:49PM +1000, Vadim Stadnik wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Ronald Garcia <rxg@cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
============================================== Review Wizard Status Report for September 2012 ============================================== ...
Please, could you add the library "STL extensions" to the Review Schedule. This is original message with request of formal review that was sent two days ago:
http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Formal-Review-Request-stl-ext-adv-td46362...
How does this library fare after the advent of Boost.Containers? From the description, it sounds like it overlaps quite a bit, to the extent that it can likely be merged with it. Additionally, surely there's a better name than "STL extensions"? First of all, some people (me) truly dislike the STL misnomer. Secondly, it doesn't convey no information about what it actually extends/provides. -- Lars Viklund | zao@acc.umu.se