Re: [boost] Interest in a Boost.Chrono/Date library

Howard Hinnant wrote:

I have other authors, and clients who have requested the MIT license, and it would be awkward to remove the MIT license at this point. I have no objection to the boost license being added to the MIT license on the boost distribution though.

This unfortunately can't work because the MIT license is more restrictive than the Boost's one. As far as I know, of course. What can work is for you to release the code under a dual license, that is, the licensee to be able to choose between MIT or Boost at his discretion.