15 Nov
2012
15 Nov
'12
7:46 p.m.
On 15 November 2012 16:37, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
The patch provided by Daniel in another post solves the issue. Thanks Daniel :)
Maybe the patch should be applied only for clang-3.1 c++11 to avoid troubles with other compilers.
Last I heard you can't do that for clang, because llvm and apple's clang use different version numbers: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2011/06/182655.php Although, maybe that's no longer true, or it's possible to do something that works well enough. We'd need someone with apple's clang to check what it does.