Re: [boost] [GIL] - too complex?

Lubomir Bourdev wrote:

So one thought I have been toying with is removing the N-dimensional concepts until we end up needing them. Or maybe even removing the 2D concepts?

That will cut down on the documentation with virtually no change in the code. Thoughts?

What about volumetric data ? Wouldn't it make sense to allow for 3D grids / rasters ? (in VSIPL++ we deal with a Tensor type, but that's a little more general as the three dimensions don't need to be spatial dimensions...) I think it makes sense to leave the possibility open to provide optimized implementations for higher-dimensional pixel containers. Regards, Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...