Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Daniel Walker wrote:
Anyway, I hope there's enough interest to include concept checks like these in the Boost Range library for a future release. I'd be glad to submit a file containing my implementations. Please, let me know what you think!
I haven't got time to look at you implementation, but I'm confident it would be a nice addition to the concept-check library. Try to contact the author/maintainer of that library directly.
OK, I just e-mailed Jeremy Siek. However, I was under the impression that new concept checking classes would be included in the library that defines the new concepts. For example, Boost.Graph and Boost.Iterator both include their own concept checks. That's why I thought range concept checks should go in the Boost Range library rather than the Boost Concept Check library. Thoughts? Daniel Walker