16 Mar
2011
16 Mar
'11
12:14 p.m.
On 16/03/11 13:11, Stewart, Robert wrote:
I generally like the names from Proto. Consistency would be nice, but consider the names as they are likely to be standardized. Better to get the names "right" now. For example, I think "postfix_increment" is a likely name for standardization, while "post_inc" is not.
I guess some typedef could be done so we have a consistent proto list of operator's name. I found myself stumbling upon unary_minus vs negate a lot of time, especially because for me negate is always this strange libm binary function that transfer sign of a over b. Renaming them in proto may break code I guess, but i dont think adding a typedef do any harm. Eric ?