[boost] Re: [ptr_container] references & copyability etc (was[ptr_container] indirect_fun - do we still need it?)

"Pavel Chikulaev" <pavel.chikulaev@gmail.com> wrote in message news:d5tr0h$fic$1@sea.gmane.org... | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> wrote in message | news:d5tnql$2ll$1@sea.gmane.org... | > what do you need the returned reference for? | Just remembering rule: "Create your own classes that behave like int". isn't it? well, that is true if we were making a value class (but we're not). (besides, you can't get the exact behavior of an int in the current language) | P.S. What's about clone_allocators - are they going to be not stateless or not? stateless for now. -Thorsten