Test at 13 Jan 2006 MS moans in basic_cstring.hpp at
value_type operator[]( size_type index ) const; value_type at( size_type index ) const;
"C4180 qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored"
I know about this. And it doen't make any sence to me. Looks like clear compiler bug.
Meanwhile, I have added to suppress_warnings.hpp
# pragma warning(disable: 4224) // nonstandard extension used : formal parameter 'tm' was previously defined as a type
tm needs renaming?
Renamed.
# pragma warning(disable: 4180) // qualifier applied to function type has no meaning; ignored
Added to supporess/enable headers
i:\boost-06-01-13-0500\boost\test\results_collector.hpp(79) : warning C4275: non dll-interface class 'boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable' used as base for dll-interface class 'boost::unit_test::singleton<Derived>' with [ Derived=boost::unit_test::results_collector_t ] i:\boost-06-01-13-0500\boost\noncopyable.hpp(22) : see declaration of 'boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable'
Should this be disabled somewhere too?
This is known MS compiler issue. I do not want this to be desabled. It's actually useful warning in general.