Rob Stewart wrote:
From: "David B. Held" <dheld@codelogicconsulting.com>
One thing I would like to say is, my only reluctance on the part of some of the logos is that while they are quite beautiful, they have too many colors to know what they would look like as a small icon.
While there is mention of optionally supply iconic versions of the submitted logo, suitability to an icon was not part of the requirements. Is it fair to change the requirements now, especially given that there is a prize waiting for the winner?
(You can certainly vote with icons in mind if you like, but that doesn't make it fair.)
No, it isn't fair. The requirements are clear. Supplying an iconic version is not part of the requirement. And no, it's not fair and it's too late to change the requirements now. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net