On 17.4.2012. 0:04, Michael Kochetkov wrote:
Hello, as far as I subscribed to boost mail list for a reason I have decided to share an interesting (at least for me) observation of boost::function facility I have encountered several years ago. The observation is about the cost of the solution and you probably may be interested if you use boost in your production.
Let us consider the following code: <snip> I have learned that personally I shall never use boost::function. You probably may want to investigate such a code bloat. Though it is probably the known and expected behavior. And I do agree that CCCC is not quite relevant here. Just for information.
A bit late but FWIW... ...Boost.Function and its 'bloatware' problems are a regular topic on this list. There have been many proposals but near-zero response from the mantainer(s). I've made a major rewrite that solves most of the problems (lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2010/10/172593.php) so you can try it out if it helps ;) -- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman