[boost] Re: method deduction (on vc?)

Max Khesin <MKhesin@liquidnet.com> writes:

But not (from your phrasing) function members?

I don't know about those; I haven't tried to find workarounds for that. FWIW, designs that depend on member detection are often flawed from a generic programming POV. You can get accidental conformance, and especially if there's no way to explicitly say what the member means (e.g. with a traits specialization), you'll be out-of-luck. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com