11 Nov
2005
11 Nov
'05
6:51 a.m.
On 11/11/05, Cromwell Enage <sponage@yahoo.com> wrote:
The metafunctions pi & e are ready. Not sure what to call them collectively in the upcoming documentation, though. "Constant Metafunction" sounds like an oxymoron. Maybe "Numeric Tag Metafunction" would be a better description.
Great! I'll start working on some more metafunctions, then. I would prefer it if we dropped the BOOST_MPL_MATH_DOUBLE in the definition of the pi-constant for double. This because BOOST_MPL_MATH_DOUBLE gives less presicion than string_c_to_double. Numeric tag metafunction does not ring well in my ears. I'll give it some thought. Regards Peder