27 Feb
2010
27 Feb
'10
3:11 a.m.
On 23 February 2010 08:26, Beman Dawes <bdawes@acm.org> wrote:
It was designed that way on the assumption that file_status would eventually include additional state information.
Would it be plausible for vendor-specific extensions here? It seemed like the biggest obstactle to providing more was portability, not implementation complexity.