1 Jun
2005
1 Jun
'05
7:24 a.m.
"Rob Stewart" <stewart@sig.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:200505312133.j4VLXJs11686@vanzandt.balstatdev.susq.com...
From: "Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk>
There were 3 reviews, all in favour of accepting the library.
While I'm not questioning the value of accepting this library specifically, doesn't it seem less than ideal to accept a library that -- for whatever reasons -- garnered only three reviews?
IMHO, not the number of reviews count, but their quality.
While the library was truly peer reviewed, and the reviews were by knowledgeable folk, the base of input is narrow as a result. Should this be the norm?
Is there anything like a norm? I think that it strongly depends on the libraries domain. Johannes