Re: [boost] [mailing list] No Reply-To in messages?

On 03/27/17 04:29, Agustín Bergé via Boost wrote:

On 3/26/2017 8:58 PM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:

...

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Andrey Semashev wrote:

...

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:

...

...

Still, I've never had this problem with the previous infrastructure. Maybe the email clients tend to not send the second email to the From address when there is Reply-To. For example, the std-discussion and std-proposals mailing lists use this scheme:

From: real original sender address To: mailing list address (e.g. "std-discussion@isocpp.org" ) Reply-To: mailing list address (e.g. std-discussion@isocpp.org)

No Cc headers.

Can we use this scheme?

That was the previous scheme which caused the DMARC failure because DMARC won't allow this ML to send email From: an address it does not own.

Well, I'm not sure I understand the details, but I can see the problems with DMARC were resolved for isocpp.org lists at some point:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/boost-steering/EcKn2yA9ip4

And I can see that now the emails from those lists contain the original sender address in the From header. I'm not sure how exactly that was achieved, but I would like this list behave the same way.

Ping?

The mailing lists for std-discussion and std-proposals are not run by isocpp.org but by google groups. The ones affected by DMARC were the WG21 lists.

Oh, I thought Herb was referring to std-discussion and std-proposals. In any case, I'm assuming these list don't have the DMARC problem because the messages contain "Received-SPF: pass ..." header.