Hubert Holin <Hubert.Holin@meteo.fr> writes:
Somewhere in the E.U., le 14/02/2005
Bonjour
In article <pan.2005.02.11.22.41.31.665443@neuromancy.net>, "Preston A. Elder" <prez@neuromancy.net> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:09:58 +0100, Hubert Holin wrote:
As an organizational note, what would be best, when we add more conversions to Python? Various pieces bundled with the lib's doc, or in a centralized location TBD?
Not really sure what you mean?
I've centralized the python conversions for my own project, which you can see here:
http://www.neuromancy.net/viewcvs/Mantra-I/python/?root=mantra
You will note that in the 'boost' directory I have added some conversions for things like boost::format, boost::date_time, and boost::logic::tribool.
Basically just the things I needed boost conversions for :)
[SNIP]
My question was regarding wether or not we had specified a way to put any existing conversion within the Boost directory structure. We could upload these to a site such as yours, but perhaps proximity to the libraries they are based on would be desirable...
I'd put it under the Boost.Python library, but I think some people would be upset at Boost.Python's resulting apparent dependency on all the wrapped libraries. To get around that problem, I think we need a separate boost library called python-bindings. Or is it a non-problem? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com