Robert Ramey wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Now, it looks like spirit is going to be "upgraded" how will this effect the current code? You do not have to lift a finger. The new code is 100% backward compatible.
LOL - If that were the case, I wouldn't have changed anything
No way to know. How
No need to know.
[...]
It seems you haven't really tried to know more beyond the name(s). Except for spririt 1.6, our recipe is similar to what was done. "Classic" Spirit will not, I repeat: will not, go away anytimne soon. It is, and will be, in the namespace "classic". This is the technical rationale behind the "baroque" include paths. We want 100% backward compatibility while at the same time usher in the new generation.
I realize that, I'm just letting you know that it was failure.
Again: post a minimal cpp file that exhibits the problem you mention. If you've done so, we would have corrected it, instead of you "wasting" your time. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net