Thorsten, This is my mistake. If people accept the idea, I suggest we start by adding a week to the duration for each review (to give people who want to participate in both time to do so) and run them as scheduled. Both Fit and Double Ended did the right thing, and I made a mistake, so I don't want to penalize either in any way if possible. John On 09/04/2017 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
Hi All,
I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review, running from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon with John (Phillips).
Now, when I look at http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html it seems that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled, greatly overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
kind regards
Thorsten